Wednesday, February 22, 2012
The Fall of Single Feather...
It's all quite contradicting, really.
If you think about it, money, in this world is actually finite. There is a maximum amount of money that actually exists on the planet. Since this numcannes fixed, for every person who earns, that will be someone who is making a loss. For every increase somewhere, there will be a loss in another place.
For example, on a gambling table, 2 people brings the same amount of money to the table. Let's say, a hundred dollars.
If A earns $10, it also means that B has lost $10.
If A earns $50, it means that B has lost $50 as well.
No matter what happens, when a party earns money, the money has to come from somewhere. Someone has to lose. This is because money is finite. Doesn't this mean that if a country is getting richer, a country would be getting poorer?
Doesnt this mean that if countries stop getting richer, poorer countries would have a better opportunity to get more income for their citizens?
Thus, a country who has an improving economy helps a poor country is actually a contradictory action. It's as if we are depriving others from a source of income to help someone else.
The only way for everyone to benefit, is if money is able to circulate in a very smooth and effective manner. This would allow people to spend what they need and equally earn what they require. Without the excess money in their saviings, no one would be making a loss. Hence, we should only earn what we need.
But wouldn't that deny us from development and improving ourselves? At what cost of others do we take in order to improve our quality of lives?
With Regards,
P.S. I feel as if I'm talking ini circles.
Taken by one of the magicians::
::